It has been one of those weeks. Many meeting with folks, much on my plate, and little time or energy left to write. I cannot believe it is Wednesday already! Alas, if idle hands are the devil's toys, I have not had to worry about being his pawn so far this week.
Today I wish to explore a question that drives about 95% of those who claim to be atheists. If God is all-powerful and all-good, why does evil exist? Could not God just eliminate it? Does not our experience show that such a God could not exist?
I will get into these questions by giving two examples from my past pastoral experience. Both occurred while I lived in Maine. In one week's time, two jarring incidences occurred.
The first involved an auto accident just down from my home where two people were killed. A man driving a mini-van fell asleep at the wheel, crossed the center line, and hit another mini-van head-on. The result was the death of two local folks in the car doing nothing but driving home.
Why did God allow this to occur? I think it is more shocking because it happened near the time when school was letting out and many in our church were on that same road. It could have been us!
Today I wish to explore a question that drives about 95% of those who claim to be atheists. If God is all-powerful and all-good, why does evil exist? Could not God just eliminate it? Does not our experience show that such a God could not exist?
I will get into these questions by giving two examples from my past pastoral experience. Both occurred while I lived in Maine. In one week's time, two jarring incidences occurred.
The first involved an auto accident just down from my home where two people were killed. A man driving a mini-van fell asleep at the wheel, crossed the center line, and hit another mini-van head-on. The result was the death of two local folks in the car doing nothing but driving home.
Why did God allow this to occur? I think it is more shocking because it happened near the time when school was letting out and many in our church were on that same road. It could have been us!
The second question involves a young boy in a local town who is transgendered and identifies with being girl instead of a boy. In the local paper, the lead story was concerning this "heroic" family who fights against the bigoted, ignorant Mainers who question how this anatomical male can be allowed to use the girl's bathroom in Middle school/high school. As you can see, our paper has a far-left lean in how they set up the article.
The question was asked, "How does a Christian worldview answer the questions of a transgendered person?" A second question was related in how do we understand the "obvious" tension between what is and what God's word declares as true?
The question was asked, "How does a Christian worldview answer the questions of a transgendered person?" A second question was related in how do we understand the "obvious" tension between what is and what God's word declares as true?
I think there are two ways to look at both of these questions. First, one can answer them by saying that what is is what is right. This is the answer of secularism and most of our culture (including many Christians who have adopted this view). So with the car accident, we have no answer. Some will attempt to give it a moral application by saying that such events should prompt us to be thankful for our family. It causes temporary sorrow, but what can we do?
Others will be outraged. They will argue that as a culture we should do everything we can to help protect people from such evil. For many this means legislation against "Driving when tired." It means a political campaign to stop "senseless" behavior. Of course the man who had the accident was taking his children from Canada to Boston for a family trip. Was this "senseless"? How do we judge?
Many of our seemingly well-intentioned laws are direct attempts to answer such questions. Folks have determined that they will protect society by legislation. They will change by political force what is, so the evil consequences will not occur again!
Many of our seemingly well-intentioned laws are direct attempts to answer such questions. Folks have determined that they will protect society by legislation. They will change by political force what is, so the evil consequences will not occur again!
Similarly, in the case of the transgendered boy, many argue what is is right. This boy did not "choose" his sexual identity, therefore what he is is right.
Really? Evolutionary science argues that humans are sexual beings. 99% of men (the other 1% lie) are often attracted to others sexually. Should they just act on these impulses? Is what is right?
Really? Evolutionary science argues that humans are sexual beings. 99% of men (the other 1% lie) are often attracted to others sexually. Should they just act on these impulses? Is what is right?
What would happen to society if we acted on these impulses? For one thing Father's Day would be very confusing! For another, the entire society would break down. In fact, this is what we are seeing because social planners have implemented these ideas into our culture. Marriage, fidelity, and purity are seen as prudish and foolish. Living together, divorce, and sexual exploration are seen as the normal. Moreover, since we see such behavior, it must be right! To argue against such behavior means you are bigot, a racist, and an un-enlightened person.
I could say more, but the question was how does a Christian worldview address these questions and tendencies in our culture?
First, we must realize that there are behaviors which are wrong and sinful. In the article in our local paper, the enlightened, tolerant parents were pitted against a backward, bigoted grandfather who objected to the boy using the girl's restroom saying, "We do not need faggots in our school." (or something like this) In the judgment of the writer and most posting in response to the article, this man's reaction was harshly judged and condemned. Is this not declaring his behavior as ultimately and completely wrong and sinful? Of course it is! The question is how to judge right from wrong?
First, we must realize that there are behaviors which are wrong and sinful. In the article in our local paper, the enlightened, tolerant parents were pitted against a backward, bigoted grandfather who objected to the boy using the girl's restroom saying, "We do not need faggots in our school." (or something like this) In the judgment of the writer and most posting in response to the article, this man's reaction was harshly judged and condemned. Is this not declaring his behavior as ultimately and completely wrong and sinful? Of course it is! The question is how to judge right from wrong?
Here is where the Christian worldview comes in. Regardless of whether I think it is wrong, if God declares it so, then it is wrong. Treating others badly is wrong. The grandfather should not have said this about the boy. Yet, questioning having an anatomical male in a girl's bathroom in middle school is not complete foolishness. This is the center of the debate and discussion. Merely asking the question cannot be out of bounds, but the questions and answers must be given in a respectful manner.
In terms of this boy, I think the more pressing question is how could he be like this? How could a good and holy God allow this to happen? After all, he did not choose these desires.
In terms of this boy, I think the more pressing question is how could he be like this? How could a good and holy God allow this to happen? After all, he did not choose these desires.
Jesus actually answered the question in John 9. When presented with a man born blind, he was asked, "Who sinned, this man or his parents?" Today we would have asked, is this really the result of individual sin? The boy had no choice. This is so unfair!
Jesus' answer is telling.
"It was neither that this man sinned, nor his parents; but it was in order that the works of God might be displayed in him. We must work the works of Him who sent Me, as long as it is day; night is coming, when no man can work. While I am in the world, I am the light of the world."
John 9: 3-5
Our world was created good, but it is fallen. Sin permeates every sphere of experience. There are still vestiges and glimpses of the created good, but sin is present! The result of sin is more sin, death, and decay. Individuals, cultures, and entire institutions are in motion either toward or away from their created good. Jesus entered into this fallen world to help make all things right. Ultimately it will be right when sin and death is finally destroyed and the new heavens and new earth emerge! Until then, we struggle against sin, death, and decay.
Thankfully, Jesus' life, death, and resurrection have overturned sin and death. His Spirit is at work turning individuals to repentance and faith. These individuals then continue the work of Jesus to bring light into the darkness. Hopefully and prayerfully this means the turning of other individuals, cultures and institutions back toward their created good. Such action is not bigoted but loving.
So, why do accidents happen? We live in a fallen world. Thankfully our hearts are made for eternity so this world is not all there is. I do not know the why and neither does anyone else. I do know that God can work to redeem even tragedy. Through tragedy love, mercy, and grace are seen. The key is to not allow tragedy to turn one bitter and blaming.
So, why do people express transgendered tendencies? We live in a fallen world. Even our healthy and natural sexual appetites can be twisted and perverted from their created good. Like all of us, transgendered folks need love and grace! No one is beyond the power of Jesus to be changed toward their created good. Healing and restoration are possible.
I could say more, but I will leave it here. What do you think?
INCLUSIVE SALVATION
ReplyDeleteWho are those who are included in salvation? All men who believe and obey what the apostle Peter preached on the Day of Pentecost are saved. It does not make any difference what denominational name is written on the church building where you worship, if you obey the gospel preached by Peter, then, you are saved, you are a member of the Lord's church, you are part of the church of Christ, you a member of the body of Christ, you are a Christian.
What did Peter preach?
1. Peter preached that Jesus was a miracle worker. (Acts 2:22)
2. Peter preached that Jesus was resurrected from the dead by God the Father.(Acts 2:24-35)
3. Peter preached that Jesus was both Lord and Christ.(Acts 2:36)
When the three thousand believe Peter, they asked "What shall we do?"(Acts 2:37)
4. Peter told them to repent and be baptized in order to have their sins forgiven.(Acts 2:38)
This is the same message Jesus preached. (Mark 16:16 "He who believes and is baptized will be saved....)
THE TERMS FOR PARDON ARE: Faith-John 3:16, Repentance-Acts 2:38, Confession-Romans 10:9-10, Baptism (immersion in water) 1 Peter 3:21
All who meet the terms for pardon are saved regardless of the denominational name on the church building.
YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY CHRISTIAN BLOG. Google search>>>>steve finnell a christian view
Thanks Steve for the comments. I do not understand why you posted them in this post since I speak about the topic elsewhere. I have several comments to make concerning your comments.
ReplyDeleteFirst, I disagree with you strongly about your claim that being baptized is necessary for salvation. What about the thief on the cross? He was not baptized and yet Jesus says he will be with him in paradise? What about those who believe but cannot be baptized before death? Are we saved by our faith in Jesus or by our faith plus something else (in this case baptism)? Your proof-texting (putting bible passages to prove your ideas without regard for context) is a dangerous trait.
Also, you claim baptism is only by immersion. Really? This is the clear teaching of the NT and the entire Bible? Your conclusion reveals your baptistic beliefs, but do they follow from what Peter says in Acts 2? On an aside, why does Peter say this promise is for you, and your children, and those who are far off? Could not this include the sacrament of baptism?
Finally, what did Peter preach? Somehow you miss a huge part of his first sermon! Jesus is the fulfillment of the OT. He is the messiah. He is the promised one and the topic of the OT. A true Christian worldview will take the whole of God's Word, both the OT and NT, to sketch a theological vision. I encourage you to take each of these points you make and answer them according to what all of God's word says about them. Such thinking will help protect from many short-sighted errors.
Again, thanks for the comments! I will be sure to take a look at your blog. Please keep reading mine!